Skip to content
Menu
Home
Staff/Board
Ethics
Ethics Complaint Form
Addiction Ministries Ethics
BIP Ethics Code
CPS Ethics Code
Community Health Worker Code
Family Support Providers Ethics
HRS Ethics Code
Marijuana Policy
Missouri Recovery Support Ethics Code
Pregnant and Parenting Families Code of Ethics
Prevention Ethics Code
Treatment Ethics Code
Youth Peer Specialist Code of Ethics
Credentials
Courses
Members Dashboard
Employment
Advertise Position
Employment Opportunities
Peer Summit
Home
Staff/Board
Ethics
Ethics Complaint Form
Addiction Ministries Ethics
BIP Ethics Code
CPS Ethics Code
Community Health Worker Code
Family Support Providers Ethics
HRS Ethics Code
Marijuana Policy
Missouri Recovery Support Ethics Code
Pregnant and Parenting Families Code of Ethics
Prevention Ethics Code
Treatment Ethics Code
Youth Peer Specialist Code of Ethics
Credentials
Courses
Members Dashboard
Employment
Advertise Position
Employment Opportunities
Peer Summit
Home
Staff/Board
Ethics
Ethics Complaint Form
Addiction Ministries Ethics
BIP Ethics Code
CPS Ethics Code
Community Health Worker Code
Family Support Providers Ethics
HRS Ethics Code
Marijuana Policy
Missouri Recovery Support Ethics Code
Pregnant and Parenting Families Code of Ethics
Prevention Ethics Code
Treatment Ethics Code
Youth Peer Specialist Code of Ethics
Credentials
Courses
Members Dashboard
Employment
Advertise Position
Employment Opportunities
Peer Summit
Facebook-f
Twitter
CPS Virtual Training Evaluation
URL
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Certified Specialist Virtual Training Evaluation
Please take time to answer the following questions. We value your feedback and make changes based on your comments.
Name:
*
First
Last
Training Attended:
*
MM slash DD slash YYYY
Please answer the following:
Please list your current age.
*
Are you currently employed in a peer support role?
*
Yes
No
Training Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the training overall?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the chance to ask questions?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the trainers?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the materials?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the time for discussion?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the chance to practice new skills?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the length of the training?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the opportunity to network with other training participants?
*
Extremely Satisfied
Satisfied
Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Extremely Dissatisfied
If you were dissatisfied with any aspect of the training, why were you dissatisfied?
Content Satisfaction
Most of the information in this training was new to me.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
I felt comfortable sharing information in this group.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
The information we received was easy to understand.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
The training was interesting to me.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
I feel confident that I know how to provide peer support to my peers.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
I understand the difference in the role of Peer Specialists and the role of non-consumer providers
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
I feel ready to begin to work with other consumers in a supportive role now.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
I would like more training so that I will feel more comfortable serving consumers.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
I would recommend this training to others.
*
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
Presenter Evaluations
Please select your 2 trainers from this list.
Please select the first of your two trainers from this list.
*
John Bartholomew
Darla Belflower
Michelle Bowles
Cherri Bridges
Jenna Caruso
Savanna Davidson
Sarah Earll
Jordan Hampton
Mirna Herrera
Toni Jordan
Carol Martin
Mark McDonald
Sheila Mihalick
Scott Moyers
Reggie Palmer
David Stoecker
D'Markus Thomas-Brown
Kenneth Vick
Please select the second of your two trainers from this list.
*
John Bartholomew
Darla Belflower
Michelle Bowles
Cherri Bridges
Jenna Caruso
Savanna Davidson
Sarah Earll
Jordan Hampton
Mirna Herrera
Toni Jordan
Carol Martin
Mark McDonald
Sheila Mihalick
Scott Moyers
Reggie Palmer
David Stoecker
D'Markus Thomas-Brown
Kenneth Vick
Please rate Michelle Bowles' presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Michelle Bowles' knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Michelle Bowles' clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Michelle Bowles' ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Michelle Bowles overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate John Bartholomew's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate John Bartholomew's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate John Bartholomew's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate John Bartholomews ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate John Bartholomew overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Cherri Bridges' presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Cherri Bridges' clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Cherri Bridges' knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Cherri Bridges' ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Cherri Bridges overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Savanna Davidson's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Savanna Davidson's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Savanna Davidson's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Savanna Davidson's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Savanna Davidson overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Toni Jordan's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Toni Jordan's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Toni Jordan's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Toni Jordan's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Toni Jordan overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mirna Herrera's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mirna Herrera's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mirna Herrera's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mirna Herrera's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mirna Herrera overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sarah Earll's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sarah Earll's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sarah Earll's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sarah Earll's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sarah Earll overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate David Stoecker's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate David Stoecker's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate David Stoecker's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate David Stoecker's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate David Stoecker overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Carol Martin's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Carol Martin's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Carol Martin's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Carol Martin's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Carol Martin overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate D'Markus Thomas-Brown's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate D'Markus Thomas-Brown's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate D'Markus Thomas-Brown's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate D'Markus Thomas-Brown's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate D'Markus Thomas-Brown overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Kenneth Vick's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Kenneth Vick's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Kenneth Vick's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Kenneth Vick's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Kenneth Vick overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sheila Mihalick's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sheila Mihalick's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sheila Mihalick's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sheila Mihalick's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Sheila Mihalick overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jenna Caruso's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jenna Caruso's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jenna Caruso's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jenna Caruso's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jenna Caruso overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mark McDonald's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mark McDonald's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mark McDonald's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mark McDonald's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Mark McDonald overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Scott Moyer's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Scott Moyer's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Scott Moyer's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Scott Moyer's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Scott Moyer overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Reggie Palmer's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Reggie Palmer's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Reggie Palmer's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Reggie Palmer's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Reggie Palmer overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jordan Hampton's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Darla Belflower's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jordan Hampton's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jordan Hampton's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jordan Hampton overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Darla Belflower's ability to interact with participants
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Darla Belflower's knowledge of concepts.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Jordan Hampton's presentation skills.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Darla Belflower's clarity.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
Please rate Darla Belflowr overall.
*
poor
fair
good
excellent
What was the best part of the training?
*
Is there anything that you would change with the training to make it better?
*
What topics would you like to see presented in future trainings?
*
Additional comments?